Article 24 of the Constitution of Kosovo (2008) explicitly prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
The Law on the protection from discrimination (2015) covers education and explicitly mentions sexual orientation and gender identity as protected grounds. Since 2019, anti-LGBTQI hate speech and hate crimes are also prohibited. Sex characteristics are not covered.
There is no evidence of laws and policies prohibiting the inclusion of LGBTQI issues as part of the curriculum or the discussion of such issues by teachers and other school employees.
With financial support from the Council of Europe, the Advisory and Coordinating Group for LGBTI Rights—established by the government in 2013—initiated the development of the National LGBTI Action Plan (2025–2027) in July 2023. The plan is currently in its final drafting stages. However, Kosovo lacked a National Action Plan for LGBTQI rights during the 2023–2024 period. Moreover, representatives from government and other relevant public institutions appointed to address LGBTI issues reportedly have little or no influence over internal decision-making processes, raising concerns about the future effectiveness of the Action Plan’s implementation.
Kosovo still lacks mandatory sex education or human rights curricula that include SOGIGESC topics. However, with financial support from UNFPA, the development of sexual education handbooks for three educational levels (grades 1–5, 6–9, and 10–12) began in 2016, incorporating SOGIGESC-related content. In late 2024, a public debate erupted—sparked by members of the Kosovo Parliament with religious affiliations and backed by right-wing conservative parties. Opposition to the handbooks was largely driven by concerns about perceived threats to family values and fears of misleading children. The controversy was further fueled by disputes over other books published by the Ministry of Education, Science, Technology, and Innovation. Amid growing public pressure, the Ministry ultimately decided to withdraw the handbooks, pledging to reassess and revise the materials.
There is currently no mandatory teacher training on LGBTQI awareness. In the past, civil society organisations such as the Center for Equality and Liberty conducted workshops with school students. However, following intense public debate fueled by allegations that CSOs were "promoting" LGBTQI identities among students, these workshops have ceased.
There is no information regarding the provision of extracurricular activities by primary and secondary schools. There is no evidence of laws and policies prohibiting LGBTQI youth clubs from meeting in school premises.
Discrimination against LGBTQI people remains common in Kosovo. Hate speech is often carried out with impunity, by political leaders.
The government does not provide funding, nor does it actively work in partnership with NGOs in relation to LGBTQI inclusive education.
There are no legal gender recognition (LGR) procedures in place in Kosovo. A number of trans people have been able to have their legal gender changed through court cases, but there is no law in place to guarantee consistent practice. In 2019, a Court in Kosovo, for the first time, allowed LGR without requiring evidence for surgical intervention or any other medical treatment.
In 2021, the Ministry of Internal Affairs established a Working Group to address issues related to the Law on Civil Registry, including legal gender recognition (LGR). That same year, the Working Group adopted a concept note outlining key reforms for LGR legislation. In 2022 and 2023, the Center for Social Groups Development (CSGD), an NGO working on LGBTQI rights in Kosovo, organised two three-day workshops with the Working Group to assess the existing law and identify necessary changes. These discussions produced clear recommendations aligned with the minimum standards for LGR as outlined in Council of Europe Resolution 2048. The proposed provisions in the Draft Civil Status Law include:
However, during the Plenary Session of the Kosovo Parliament on May 24, 2024, the draft law was rejected in its first reading, primarily due to opposition to its provisions on legal gender recognition. Conservative political parties and MPs with religious affiliations voiced strong objections, leading to the draft being sent back to the government for revision.
No information is available about policies or practices allowing trans students to use their correct name and gender in schools.
The government does not provide funding, nor actively works in partnership with NGOs in relation to education to support initiatives aimed at fostering inclusive educational environments and promoting the rights and well-being of LGBTQI learners.
The government does not collect data on anti-LGBTI bullying, but the Ombudsperson has in some instances reported on SOGIGESC issues. Civil society gathers data on discrimination and violence.
Neither the government nor schools provide targeted support for LGBTQI learners or their families.
Civil society organisations provide support to LGBTQI youth with limited state support.
No relevant guidelines are in place for teachers or LGBTQI learners.
There is no information about the specific availability of information on LGBTQI issues in schools, but there is no evidence of laws and policies prohibiting the presence of such information in school grounds.
As Kosovo is not a member of the United Nations, it is unable to ratify international conventions, treaties, and instruments. However, Article 22 of the Constitution explicitly outlines the international agreements and instruments that are directly applicable in Kosovo. Among these is the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), whereas the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), which enshrines the right to education, is not included.
Kosovo is a member of the European Governmental LGBTI Focal Points Network (as of November 2020), but has not signed the 2016 UNESCO Call for Action.
Here is the country's score for each ground of discrimination on which we based our observations for 8 of the 10 indicators presented above.
To enable a meaningful comparison of country progress over time, we have retroactively aligned the scoring systems used in the 2018 and 2022 Editions of IGLYO’s LGBTQI Inclusive Education Index with the updated 2025 scoring criteria. While each edition of the research has built on the previous one, reflecting evolving standards and priorities in inclusive education, minor changes to indicators and scoring weights were introduced in 2022 and 2025 to improve clarity, consistency, and comprehensiveness.
By recalculating the earlier scores according to the 2025 framework, we have tried to ensure comparability across all three editions and provide a more accurate picture of progress, stagnation, or regression in each country’s approach to LGBTQI-inclusive education. For this reason, you might find some scores in the PDF Report & Index 2018 and 2022 differing from those on the Education website for these two years.