All forms of discrimination are prohibited under the Constitution of the Slovak Republic. According to the Constitution, the right to education is one of the basic human rights guaranteed by the Constitution and a right that is granted to everyone. Measures to combat discrimination based on SOGIGESC however, are not explicitly mentioned.
The Act on Equal Treatment in Certain Areas and Protection against Discrimination (2004) applies to the educational sector and includes a provision banning discrimination in education on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, but does not mention sex characteristics.
Furthermore, the Act on Education and Training (2008) and its Amendment (the School Act) explicitly prohibits discrimination on the basis of all protected grounds and calls for equality when accessing education and training. SOGIGESC grounds are not, however, explicitly mentioned.
In 2024, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico proposed a constitutional amendment reinforcing conservative values, including a binary gender definition and restrictions on LGBTQI education, which has faced widespread criticism. This constitutional amendment was passed in April 2025.
There are no dedicated policies or action plans regarding education and SOGIGESC issues in Slovakia.
The not binding National guidance on the prevention and resolution of harassment of students in schools and school facilities (2006) does not include any provisions related to diversity or protected grounds.
ECRI has recommended that the Slovak authorities develop an action plan for LGBTQI persons, in close consultation with civil society.
In 2021, the government developed a Strategy for an inclusive approach in education until 2030. A first Action Plan for the implementation of this strategy was developed for the years 2022-2024. Subsequently, a second Action Plan was developed for the implementation of the Strategy for the years 2025-2027. The strategy goals of these plans include: Inclusive education and support measures; Advisory system in education; Desegregation in education and training,; Debarrierisation of the school environment; Preparation and education of teaching staff and professional staff; and Destigmatisation. However, neither of these action plans specifically relates to SOGIGESC issues or LGBTQI inclusive education.
The compulsory national curriculum does not include dedicated sex and relationship education. However, it contains the cross-curricular (Biology, Ethics and Religion classes) and non-compulsory course “Education to Marriage and Parenthood”. The Ethics component of this course discusses SOGIGESC topics in a general and neutral way for general secondary schools. Nevertheless, there is evidence that the Religion component is predominantly heteronormative and dismissive of LGBTQI identities, i.e. religion classes of the Augsburg confession (Protestant) contain materials for teachers on how to discuss the primacy of heterosexuality in marriage and equates “homosexuality” to other topics such as “adultery, promiscuity and prostitution,”.
The country has a civic education curriculum that does not include discussion of SOGIGESC issues.
In the past years, there have been several attempts to introduce a parental veto on comprehensive sexuality education in schools, including in 2023. Representatives of the Slovak National Party (SNS), part of the governing coalition, attempted to ban information related to SOGIGESC in schools, labeling it as propaganda. They proposed an amendment to the Education Act that would have prohibited all content related to "non-traditional sexual orientation" in educational settings. The draft law included a clause stating: "In schools and school facilities, it is prohibited in any way, directly or indirectly, to carry out the promotion, dissemination, or support of ideas and opinions regarding non-traditional sexual orientations or gender identities that are not in accordance with the biological identity of the individual." This proposal was ultimately rejected by Education Minister Tomáš Drucker. On Thursday, November 7, 2024, the Slovak Parliament voted on the amendment and the law was not adopted. Despite this outcome, the SNS declared its intent to continue pushing against what it calls “LGBTI propaganda” in schools.
Even if topics related to sexual orientation and gender identity are absent in the curricula and plans of individual subjects, one can refer to some methodologies and standards. In biology for high school, the four-year five-year educational programs and the standards of human biology and a healthy lifestyle include information about homosexuality and heterosexuality.
There is currently no mandatory teacher training on LGBTQI awareness. Some universities, for instance the Faculty of Education at the Comenius University in Bratislava or the Faculty of Arts of the Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice include a number of courses for aspiring teachers on the topics of gender, sexual orientation and gender identity.
According to the FRA LGBTIQ Survey III, 88% of respondents under the age of 18 in Slovakia reported witnessing or hearing negative comments or behavior directed at classmates perceived to be part of the LGBTQI community. Additionally, 58% of under-18 respondents stated that they “always” or “often” concealed or disguised their own LGBTQI identity during their studies.
Students and youth clubs are commonly found in Slovakian schools. LGBTQI youth organisations are not banned from meeting on school premises, however there is no experience of LGBTQI youth organisations in school premises due to the politicisation of LGBTQI youth.
The 2016-2020 legislature has impacted the social climate towards LGBTQI persons negatively. Although there have been no discussions at an institutional level regarding the exclusion of LGBTQI elements from the curriculum, all existing collaboration with civil society organisations has ceased to exist during the 2016-2020 legislature.
Support to LGBTQI students, teachers and parents has generally been provided by NGOs. However, during the 2016-2020 legislature the government halted the collaboration between LGBTQI NGOs and the Ministry of Education. In this period, while there was no official ban for schools to cooperate with human rights organisations, LGBTQI organisations (and Amnesty International Slovakia) have experienced that schools do not want to engage with them – either for ideological reasons or for fear of stirring public controversy. There were cases in the media where local politicians wanted to polarise or scandalise the topic. For instance, there was an incident when a member of the extreme-right party ‘Popular Party – Our Slovakia’ complained to the media about his son’s school, which organised a carnival where “boys dressed as girls”. It seems that schools have been under political pressure to avoid topics of gender identity and sexual orientation in general.
In 2023, a survey by Inakost found that 86% of students had heard anti-LGBTQI comments in school and 37% had been personally targeted by negative comments or behaviour from their classmates.
In 2024, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico (Smer-SD) proposed a constitutional amendment, aiming to reinforce conservative values, particularly targeting LGBTQI rights. The proposal would enshrine a binary understanding of gender into the Constitution, thus erasing intersex people and undermining the rights of trans individuals. The proposal would also restrict education content and ensure that parents have the right to exclude their children from any education beyond the state curriculum, including education on LGBTQI inclusion. The proposal has been widely criticised for promoting discrimination and escalating anti-LGBTQI rhetoric. The coalition lacks the 90 votes needed to pass the amendment and is seeking support from the conservative KDH party, which is proposing its version of the constitutional change. The amendment is scheduled to take effect on the 1st of July 2025, if adopted. On February 13, 2025, the opposition party KDH presented its own proposal for constitutional amendments, which would enshrine parents' rights and role in raising and educating their children as they see fit.
The government does not provide funding nor actively work in partnership with NGOs in relation to LGBTQI inclusive education.
The Personal Identification Numbers Act (1995) allows an individual to change the gender marker on their individual identification number after the presentation of a medical certificate. However the procedure requires unclear medical requirements which are interpreted as requiring sterilisation, surgery and a psychological diagnosis. Divorce also remains mandatory.
Since November 2018, the Legal Act on Universities contains a provision which allows individuals who have obtained legal gender recognition to receive a replacement of their diplomas from universities if they have changed their name or legal gender since graduating. However, this remains impossible for high school diplomas.
There are no national guidelines allowing students to use their preferred name in school or universities prior to accessing Legal Gender Recognition.
ECRI’s report on Slovakia called on the government to proceed with the implementation of Professional guidelines to unify medical procedures for issuing medical opinions on gender reassignment, which abolished the sterility requirement but was suspended due to anti-trans pressure in 2022. In 2023, the guidelines were finally approved by the outgoing Minister of Health Lengvarský, but issues with implementation remain.
In 2023, the parliament passed in the first reading a bill that would de facto ban LGR entirely. The bill sets out that LGR would only be available to those who can submit a genetic test proving that their “sex” was “incorrectly determined” by doctors at birth. It also establishes that gendered birth numbers could not be changed, which would ‘out’ trans people, who change their name. The move, which was criticised by the Ombudsperson, received wide media attention, including internationally, and was criticised by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Amnesty International, LGBTQI organisations and MEPs called for its immediate withdrawal. An identical bill was submitted to the new parliament in November 2023 by the same MPs from former OĽANO (now “Slovakia”) party, who are members of Christian Union.
In November 2023, the Slovak Ministry of Health revoked the Professional Guidelines, a key document that had helped standardise and improve healthcare procedures related to gender transition, including medical documentation required for legal gender recognition. The guidelines also aimed to eliminate the ongoing practice of forced sterilisation, which, though not legally mandated, has continued in Slovakia. Following their cancellation, such procedures are expected to recur, with several cases already reported.
In April 2024, the Ministry also annulled another important document, the Standard Procedure for Diagnosis and Comprehensive Management of Health Care for an Adult Person with Transsexualism. This document established clear medical protocols to prevent arbitrary and potentially harmful practices. Its cancellation, criticised by professional bodies like the Slovak Psychiatric Society and the Slovak Medical Society, lacks medical justification and further endangers access to safe, consistent healthcare for transgender individuals in Slovakia.
The government does not collect data on LGBTQI students’ experiences.
Since the 2017–2018 school year, the State School Inspection has been collecting data for its Report on Education for Democratic Citizenship and Human Rights in Primary and Secondary Schools (Grammar Schools and Secondary Vocational Schools). As part of this report, students are asked about their perceptions of discrimination, including whether they would stand up for a classmate facing attacks based on race, social origin, nationality, religion, or sexual orientation.
In the 2017/2018 school year, 74.44% of secondary school students said they would stand up for a minority classmate. This figure increased to approximately 80% in 2018/2019. A similar survey was conducted in primary schools during the 2018/2019 school year, where 88% of students expressed their willingness to support minority classmates. Non-governmental organisation Iniciatíva Inakosť published a nationwide report in 2017 on experiences of LGBTQ persons in Slovakia. The survey also asked whether the respondents experienced stigma, name-calling or bullying in school. 52,7% of the survey respondents claimed to have such experiences.
Schools are required to have a guidance counselor who is trained in providing support and relief to victims of bullying and harassment. In most cases, this role is fulfilled by a teacher who received specific training. However, Eastern Slovakia and some rural regions are often lacking such ‘school psychologists’. Furthermore, they are not consistently trained in LGBTQI-related topics. School psychologists are encouraged to refer youth to the Pedagogical and Psychological Guidance Centres present in each Slovakian region.
To improve the effectiveness of the current system, the Slovak Institute for Youth (IUVENTA), an agency of the Ministry of Education, has been running the pilot programme ‘School without hate’ since 2018. The program has the objective of implementing standards concerning the prevention of bullying, cyberbullying, hate speech and human rights abuses at primary and secondary schools. A cooperation between experts and individual schools assesses internal policies and the school climate, as well as practices. The final outcome of this process is a list of recommendations on how to achieve a better support system as well as stronger preventive measures in each school.
LGBTQI civil society organisations do not receive funding to provide support to LGBTQI youth. However, the non-governmental organisation PRIZMA (based in Košice - Eastern Slovakia) cooperates with school psychologists upon their requests.
The organisation Inporadna has set up a face-to-face and online counseling centre in Bratislava and provides information on bias-motivated bullying and harassment in schools on its website.
Schools generally do not provide information through leaflets and posters regarding LGBTQI communities.
Schools generally do not provide information regarding the local community through leaflets and posters. Teachers are allowed to discuss LGBTQI-related topics in school settings.
However, according to the experience of members of Iniciatíva Inakos, some schools (predominantly secondary schools in Bratislava) do have information on LGBTQI identities and rights available in forms of posters and leaflets.
Schools are required to adopt anti-bullying policies. However, the national framework on anti-bullying does not address the underlying causes of bullying and therefore does not mention SOGIGESC.
Slovakia has ratified eight of the nine core UN treaties, including the ICESCR and the CRC, which enshrine the right to education. Slovakia is a member of the European Governmental LGBTI Focal Points Network (as of November 2020), but has not signed the 2016 UNESCO Call for Action.
Here is the country's score for each ground of discrimination on which we based our observations for 8 of the 10 indicators presented above.
To enable a meaningful comparison of country progress over time, we have retroactively aligned the scoring systems used in the 2018 and 2022 Editions of IGLYO’s LGBTQI Inclusive Education Index with the updated 2025 scoring criteria. While each edition of the research has built on the previous one, reflecting evolving standards and priorities in inclusive education, minor changes to indicators and scoring weights were introduced in 2022 and 2025 to improve clarity, consistency, and comprehensiveness.
By recalculating the earlier scores according to the 2025 framework, we have tried to ensure comparability across all three editions and provide a more accurate picture of progress, stagnation, or regression in each country’s approach to LGBTQI-inclusive education. For this reason, you might find some scores in the PDF Report & Index 2018 and 2022 differing from those on the Education website for these two years.